Synthetic Dye Ban Is Reshaping the Food Industry: Who Will Survive?

The next time you pick up a box of cereal or a bag of candy, the colors inside won’t be what they used to be. This shift is sending shockwaves through the food industry, and manufacturers who don’t adapt quickly risk losing shelf space entirely.

In 2025, the FDA and Department of Health and Human Services signaled plans to phase out petroleum-based synthetic dyes by the end of 2026.¹ Red Dye No. 3 is already slated for removal by 2027.² Consumer demand for “clean label” products has moved from niche to mainstream.³

But it’s the retailers driving urgency. Walmart has committed to eliminating synthetic dyes from all its U.S. private-label food lines by January 2027.⁴ Walmart operates over 4,600 stores across the United States.⁵ For suppliers, this is a mandate: reformulate or lose distribution.

The U.S. is playing catch-up. Europe has required warning labels on foods containing certain synthetic dyes for years, and Red Dye 3 was banned there more than 30 years ago. American manufacturers are racing to meet standards their European counterparts have navigated for decades.

General Mills plans to remove certified colors from cereals by mid-2026 and from its full portfolio by 2027.¹ Kraft Heinz has pledged removal by end of 2027.⁶ Nestlé, Conagra, Campbell’s, Hershey, and Smucker are making similar commitments.³

The challenges are substantial. Natural dyes are less stable under heat, light, and pH changes.¹ They’re often three to ten times more expensive than synthetic alternatives.¹ Sourcing them means dealing with seasonal variation, climate risk, and purity constraints.⁷ Blues and greens are particularly problematic, with limited natural alternatives.

Manufacturers must act immediately. First, validate new formulations through extensive testing. Co-packers need to requalify processes, as equipment may require adjustments to prevent natural dyes from degrading. Second, secure supply chains with multiple suppliers. Third, decide whether to absorb higher costs or raise prices and risk losing volume.

For suppliers, this represents massive opportunity but also significant pressure. Companies producing stable natural dyes at scale are in high demand.¹ Suppliers must invest in capacity expansion, improve batch consistency, and ensure rigorous quality controls. Those who can deliver consistent color intensity and reliable traceability will command premium pricing.

Large manufacturers with substantial R&D budgets can navigate this transition. But smaller conventional manufacturers face an existential threat. They lack resources for extensive R&D, can’t negotiate volume discounts on expensive natural colorants, and have less margin flexibility. Margin pressure is real as costs must be absorbed or passed on.⁷

While this is a tough spot for smaller conventional manufacturers, it provides a unique opportunity for natural food CPG companies to reach mainstream retailers. As conventional brands struggle to reformulate or miss retailer deadlines, they risk delisting. Natural food companies already using clean ingredients can step in and capture shelf space at retailers desperate to meet their dye-free commitments.

For all brands navigating this shift, partner with ingredient suppliers who have solved natural dye challenges. Share reformulation costs through collaborative R&D. Start with highest-volume SKUs and accept that some products may need discontinuation if reformulation isn’t economically viable.

What looks like a cosmetic change is actually a structural transformation. Retailers are forcing compliance, large manufacturers are adapting despite the cost, and smaller conventional players face a brutal reality while natural food brands see unprecedented opportunity.

If your company is looking to reach the buyers at major retailers across the US, Chain Store Guide’s LeadSearch technology is your resource for B2B sales and marketing.

Sources:

1. Food Industry Executive
2. Virginia Tech News
3. Forbes
4. Reuters
5. Chain Store Guide
6. Investopedia
7. ASCM